Draft groundrules for Critical Mental Health Forum meetings
At the first meeting of the forum (January 2001) there was discussion about the group’s aims -- minutes available at:
www.critpsynet.freeuk.com/criticalmentalhealth.htm). At the third meeting (April 2001) there was explicit discussion of ground-rules for the meetings given the potential power differences (eg between professionals and service users/survivors). This issue was returned to at the May 2003 meeting following disagreements outside the forum between meeting attenders. It was agreed to revise the ground-rules so that there were clear expectations.
- Differences of view will be respected and forum members are asked to avoid dominanting the meeting, interrupting or talking over others.
- Offensive or discriminatory comments about others (eg of a sexist, racist, heterosexist etc nature) will not be tolerated – it is important to create an atmosphere where there is respect for different views and where people will feel safe enough to express those views.
- If people say things they would not like to be shared outside perhaps they could note this in the meeting. In general members are asked not to share personal information about others discussed at the meetings outside of the group unless the person has clearly shared it with the intention of it being publicised.
- There is a need to allow time and space to clarify issues during discussion. Given that attenders at the meetings come from a range of positions, individuals should make clear what they mean by the terms (eg 'illness') they use.
- The need to avoid making assumptions about others in the group was highlighted. This led to a discussion about the need to work collectively, to be reflective as we participate in the group, and to be aware that we might be making assumptions.
- Given that not all attenders feel comfortable talking in front of a large group, we should try to allow space for small group discussions or informal time (eg a cigarette break or drinks after in the pub) at meetings if possible.
If an attender at a meeting is clearly breaching one or more of these groundrules it is the responsibility both of the chair of the meeting and of other attenders to ask the person to stop doing so. If they continue to breach these groundrules (eg by making remarks others find offensive) then they may be asked to leave the meeting.